80 papers. Curated, evaluated, and organized by topic. Every entry includes a full citation, a source link, and our assessment of what the paper contributes — and where the open questions remain.
This is PCIC's annotated bibliography of the polymer concrete research literature. We include papers that meaningfully advance understanding of polymer concrete behavior, formulation, durability, or application — and we note where the literature is thin or inconsistent, because that's as useful as knowing what's been established.
The library is curated, not exhaustive. It grows as PCIC synthesizes new publications.
Mechanical Properties★★★★☆
Applications★★★★☆
Resin Systems★★★★☆
Mix Design & Formulation★★★☆☆
Shrinkage & Dimensional Behavior★★★☆☆
Durability & Chemical Resistance★★★☆☆
Cure Science & Reaction Kinetics★★★☆☆
Thermal Behavior★★★☆☆
Long-Term & Creep Behavior★★☆☆☆
Reinforced PC (Structural)★★☆☆☆
Production & Processing★☆☆☆☆
Filter80 entries
Standards & Design Guides
16 entries
ACI Committee 548. (2009). ACI PRC-548.1-09: Guide for the Use of Polymers in Concrete. American Concrete Institute.
The foundational ACI guide covering all polymer-concrete categories. Establishes material definitions, application domains, and performance expectations that underpin most subsequent literature. More useful as a reference framework than as a source of current data.
ACI Committee 548. (2019). ACI PRC-548.6-19: Polymer Concrete — Guidelines for Structural Applications. American Concrete Institute.
The most current ACI structural design guidance for polymer concrete, covering load factors, member sizing, and reinforcement considerations. The appropriate starting point for any structural application. Gaps remain in formulation-specific guidance and load-factor calibration against modern failure data.
ASTM International. (2001). ASTM C579: Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes.
The standard test method for polymer concrete compressive strength. Defines specimen geometry, loading rate, and reporting requirements. Required reading before designing any compressive strength study — protocol differences from OPC testing affect cross-study comparability.
ASTM International. (2017). ASTM D6783: Standard Specification for Polymer Concrete Pipe.
The product specification governing polymer concrete pipe for drainage applications. Defines dimensional tolerances, minimum mechanical properties, and chemical resistance requirements. Useful as a performance benchmark — the minimum property floors it establishes are instructive for formulation targets.
ACI Committee 548. (2025). ACI SPEC-548.17-25: Circular Precast Polymer-Concrete Manholes — Specification. American Concrete Institute.
A first-party, current ACI product specification for exactly this library's core product category. Sets the numeric floor P3PC is measured against: ≥10,000 psi compressive strength, ≤0.2% absorption, a 112-day six-reagent chemical immersion protocol, a hard requirement for non-calcareous aggregate, and a 50-year warranty basis. The most directly applicable standard in the library.
ACI Committee 440. (2015). ACI 440.1R-15: Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars. American Concrete Institute.
Covers FRP rebar reinforcement of ordinary hydraulic-cement concrete — not polymer concrete as a matrix material. Relevant only if precast PC components are reinforced with GFRP/CFRP bar rather than steel; useful reference for FRP material properties and bond/development-length mechanics in that scenario.
ASTM International. (2002). ASTM C580: Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes.
The companion test method to C579 for the field's two most commonly reported mechanical properties — flexural strength and modulus. Defines both tangent and secant modulus with a toe-compensation procedure that's easy to skip informally but materially affects reported values.
ASTM International. (1998). ASTM C497: Standard Test Methods for Concrete Pipe, Manhole Sections, or Tile.
A methods compendium for OPC pipe/manhole testing — three-edge bearing, absorption, hydrostatic, manhole step, cylinder strength — incorporated by reference into C478. Directly relevant to P3PC manholes marketed as drop-in C478 replacements, particularly the step pull/vertical-load and boiling absorption tests.
ASTM International. (1997). ASTM C478: Standard Specification for Precast Reinforced Concrete Manhole Sections.
The incumbent OPC manhole specification — the standard municipal buyers already know. Sets the competitive floor P3PC beats on nearly every axis: 4000 psi minimum strength, 9%/8.5% absorption cap, 400/800 lb step loads. A direct side-by-side table against these thresholds is a ready-made sales comparison.
ASTM International. (2012). ASTM C857-12a: Standard Practice for Minimum Structural Design Loading for Underground Precast Concrete Utility Structures.
The load-input practice (vehicle/pedestrian live loads, impact factors, dead-load unit weights) cited directly by ACI SPEC-548.17-25 for manhole roof and wall design. Any P3PC manhole structural package should state which load designation (A-16 "heavy traffic" is the default) and impact factor were used.
ASTM International. (2003). ASTM C443: Standard Specification for Joints for Concrete Pipe and Manholes, Using Rubber Gaskets.
Governs rubber-gasket joint design and material performance for pipe/manhole joints — largely material-agnostic to the pipe body. Relevant if P3PC manhole risers use gasketed bell-and-spigot joints rather than resin-bonded joints.
ASTM International. (2014). ASTM C990-09(2014): Standard Specification for Joints for Concrete Pipe, Manholes, and Precast Box Sections Using Preformed Flexible Joint Sealants.
The preformed bitumen/butyl-rubber sealant alternative to C443's gasket approach — more common in non-pressure storm/culvert box sections than pressure-rated sanitary manholes. Lower priority than C443/C478 unless P3 targets storm-drain box-section products.
ASTM International. (1999). ASTM C33-99a: Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates.
The Portland-cement aggregate gradation and quality spec — referenced by name (gradation waived) in polymer-concrete pipe specs like D6783. Its deleterious-substance and soundness limits remain a useful aggregate-quality baseline for PC even though its gradation curves don't directly apply to a resin-bound system.
ASTM International. (2014). ASTM C39/C39M-14: Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens.
The default OPC compressive test — what a non-PC engineer will assume applies. Polymer concrete instead uses C579's different specimen geometries and loading rates. Any P3PC-vs-OPC compressive strength comparison should note explicitly that the two are tested by different methods.
ASTM International. (2020). ASTM D543-20: Standard Practices for Evaluating the Resistance of Plastics to Chemical Reagents.
A standardized reagent list and immersion/ESCR protocol for plastics generally. A strong candidate as the citable, cross-material-comparable basis for P3PC chemical-resistance claims, distinct from the polymer-concrete-pipe-specific long-term protocol in D6783.
ASTM International. (2007). ASTM D2369-07: Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of Coatings.
A gravimetric volatile-content method for coatings/paints, not polymer concrete. Marginal relevance — a plausible basis for resin volatile-content QC (e.g., styrene content) or for any P3 coating/sealer product line, but not central to the structural PC program.
Fowler, D.W. (1999). Polymers in concrete: a vision for the 21st century. Cement and Concrete Composites, 21(5–6), 449–452.
A concise retrospective from one of the field's most important figures, tracing four decades of development across all polymer-concrete categories. Valuable as a time-capsule of knowledge at the turn of the millennium — many of the gaps he identifies are still gaps today.
Fowler, D.W. (2018). Concrete-polymer materials: how far have we come, and where do we need to go? ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 1).
Fowler's 2018 update to his 1999 retrospective. Documents progress and identifies persistent gaps — particularly in standardization and long-term durability data. Read alongside the 1999 paper: what changed and what didn't is itself informative about the field's pace of development.
Bedi, R., Chandra, R., & Singh, S.P. (2013). Mechanical properties of polymer concrete. Journal of Composites, 2013, Article 948745.
A systematic survey of mechanical property data across resin types. Establishes defensible ranges for compressive strength, flexural strength, and modulus. The most useful mechanical reference for cross-resin comparison, though the authors aggregate studies with inconsistent controls — treat the ranges as indicative.
Bedi, R., Chandra, R., & Singh, S.P. (2014). Reviewing some properties of polymer concrete. The Indian Concrete Journal, 88(8), 47–68.
A companion to the 2013 paper, expanding coverage to durability, thermal behavior, and mix design variables. The most comprehensive single-paper treatment of polymer concrete properties in the library. Useful as an orientation document.
Kumar, A., Gupta, D., & Minocha, A.K. (2016). Review on mechanical and durability properties of epoxy, polyester, and furan polymer concrete. Journal of Polymer Engineering, 36(9), 851–864.
Compares epoxy, polyester, and furan PC across mechanical and durability dimensions. One of the few reviews that directly positions these three resin families against each other on a consistent set of criteria.
Martinez-Barrera, G., Vigueras-Santiago, E., Hagg Lobland, H.E., & Gencel, O. (2011). Polymer concretes: a description and methods for modification and improvement. Journal of Materials Education, 33(1–2), 37–52.
Reviews approaches to improving polymer concrete mechanical performance — aggregate selection, resin modification, fiber reinforcement, nano-filler additions. Useful as a map of the design space rather than a source of definitive data.
Palamarchuk, A., Yudaev, P., & Chistyakov, E. (2024). Polymer concretes based on various resins: modern research and modeling of mechanical properties. Journal of Composites Science, 8(12), 503.
The most recent comprehensive review in the library, covering both experimental and modeling approaches through 2023. Unusually broad treatment of finite element and analytical approaches to PC structural behavior alongside standard property data.
Li, X., Gu, J., Xu, Y., Li, S., & Zhang, R. (2025). Review of component materials and diverse applications of polymer concrete. Materials, 18, 2745.
A 2025 review covering the full landscape of PC component materials and application categories. The most current single-paper overview available. Individual claims should be traced to primary sources before relying on specific data values.
Thomason, J.L., & Xypolias, G. (2023). Hydrothermal ageing of glass fibre reinforced vinyl ester composites: a review. Polymers, 15(4), 835.
A rigorous review of hydrothermal degradation mechanisms in glass fiber–vinyl ester systems. Though focused on fiber composites rather than aggregate-filled PC, the resin-level mechanisms — plasticization, hydrolysis, interphase degradation — are directly applicable to VE PC in wet service.
Czarnecki, L., Taha, M.M., & Wang, R. (2018). Are polymers still driving forces in concrete technology? ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 26).
A field-taxonomy and history piece covering C-PC classification, the ICPIC lineage since 1975, polymer-cement chemical interaction, and an early nanotechnology/3D-printing roadmap. Useful for orienting where PC sits relative to the broader polymer-in-concrete field.
Kaeding, A.O. (2018). A perspective on 40 years of polymers in concrete history. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 40).
A practitioner's 40-year history (1976–2018) of precast PC for underground utility enclosures and drainage structures. Directly compares polyester (standard) vs. VE (corrosive service) resin selection and surveys the standards landscape (WUC 3.6, ANSI SCTE 77, ASTM C857/C497, AASHTO), flagging a real safety-factor discrepancy (1.5 vs. 2.8) across them worth resolving before citing any one in isolation.
Cook, W.D., Simon, G.P., Burchill, P.J., Lau, M., & Fitch, T.J. (1997). Curing kinetics and thermal properties of vinyl ester resins. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 64(4), 769–781.
A foundational study of VE cure kinetics by DSC and DMTA. Establishes the relationship between cure temperature and glass transition temperature, calibrates heat of polymerization (57–67 kJ/mol range) for DSC conversion calculations, and documents the conversion-vitrification ceiling. The single most important cure science reference in the library for vinyl ester systems.
Scott, T.F., Cook, W.D., & Forsythe, J.S. (2002). Kinetics and network structure of thermally cured vinyl ester resins. European Polymer Journal, 38(4), 705–716.
Deeper characterization of VE cure kinetics and resulting network structure, including oxygen inhibition effects. Provides conversion data as a function of temperature and time. The companion to Cook 1997; together they give the most complete kinetic picture of VE cure in the library.
Scott, T.F., Cook, W.D., & Forsythe, J.S. (2002). Photo-DSC cure kinetics of vinyl ester resins. I. Influence of temperature. Polymer, 43(22), 5839–5845.
Uses photo-DSC to characterize VE polymerization rate at isothermal temperatures — a methodology that isolates kinetic behavior without thermal artifacts. The isothermal approach is directly applicable to designing cure schedule experiments and selecting post-cure hold temperatures.
Characterizes VE rheology alongside cure kinetics and dynamic mechanical response. Determines activation energy (50.04 kJ/mol — consistent with Cook 1997) and documents the gelation-to-vitrification window. The viscosity development data is useful for understanding onset of stress generation in constrained casting geometries.
Fink, B.K., Bogetti, T.A., Stone, M.A., & Gillespie, J.W. (2002). Thermochemical response of vinyl-ester resin during curing. Army Research Laboratory Technical Report.
Documents the exothermic thermal profile of VE cure — peak temperatures, timing, and the relationship between exotherm magnitude and mix variables. One of the few papers that treats the cure exotherm as an engineering variable rather than background noise.
Moujdin, I.A., et al. (2022). Development of low shrinkage curing techniques for unsaturated polyester and vinyl ester reinforced composites. Materials, 15, 2972.
Characterizes shrinkage in neat polyester and VE resins across cure conditions. One of the few papers that isolates resin-level shrinkage as the experimental variable — useful for separating resin contribution from aggregate restraint effects when interpreting composite shrinkage data.
Peppas, N.A., Moynihan, H.J., & Lucht, L.M. (1985). The structure of highly crosslinked poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 19(4), 397–411.
Foundational biomedical network chemistry paper establishing the relationship between crosslink density, network structure, and mechanical properties in methacrylate systems. Theoretical grounding for understanding how reactive diluent composition affects cured network properties in modern VE resins.
Bénéthuilière, T., et al. (2020). Vinylester/glass fiber interface: still a key component for designing new styrene-free SMC composite materials. Composites Science and Technology, 190, 108037.
Characterizes a styrene-free VE formulation using an alternative reactive diluent — covering wettability, glass transition temperature, conversion, and fiber-matrix interface behavior. Key finding: styrene-free VE systems process differently but achieve comparable cured properties. The only dedicated experimental paper on styrene-free VE chemistry in the library.
Józefiak, K., & Michalczyk, R. (2020). Prediction of structural performance of vinyl ester polymer concrete using FEM elasto-plastic model. Materials, 13, 4034.
Experimental characterization of vinyl ester PC combined with FEM structural validation for a manhole cover application. Provides modulus, compressive strength, and failure load data alongside a validated computational model. A key reference for structural design of VE PC precast products.
Jin, N.J., Yeon, J., Min, S.-H., & Yeon, K.-S. (2018). Strength developments and deformation characteristics of MMA-modified vinyl ester polymer concrete. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 12, 71.
Systematic characterization of MMA-modified VE PC across compressive, flexural, tensile, elastic modulus, and thermal expansion properties. Compressive strengths of 6,352–11,194 psi (43.8–77.2 MPa at 168h) reported. The thermal expansion data for VE PC is particularly valuable — rarely reported elsewhere.
Rochman, T., et al. (2024). Vinyl-ester-based polymer concrete incorporating high volume fly ash under tensile, compressive, and flexural loads. Journal of King Saud University — Engineering Sciences.
Experimental study of VE PC with varying filler additions. Directly relevant to formulations using pozzolanic fillers. Documents the effect of filler content on compressive strength and workability within a VE binder system.
Yeon, J. (2020). Deformability of bisphenol A-type epoxy resin-based polymer concrete with different hardeners and fillers. Applied Sciences, 10, 1336.
Characterizes modulus, setting shrinkage, and coefficient of thermal expansion for epoxy PC across different hardener and filler combinations. Provides insight into deformability under varying formulation choices. Useful as a point of comparison for VE PC deformability data, which is less documented in the literature.
Yeon, J.H., Lee, H.J., & Yeon, J. (2020). Deformability of polyester polymer concrete. Materials, 13, 727.
Companion to the epoxy deformability paper, using polyester PC under consistent methodology. Together these two papers provide comparative deformability data across resin types — a direct cross-resin comparison that is rare in the literature.
Abdel-Fattah, H., & El-Hawary, M.M. (1999). Flexural behavior of polymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 13(5), 253–262.
One of the few papers that characterizes reinforced polymer concrete beams under four-point bending, testing both epoxy and polyester systems at multiple steel ratios. Load-deflection curves, crack patterns, and failure modes for reinforced PC elements are essentially absent from most of the literature.
Reis, J.M.L., & Ferreira, A.J.M. (2004). Assessment of fracture properties of epoxy polymer concrete reinforced with short carbon and glass fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 18(7), 523–528.
Characterizes fracture toughness of epoxy PC using notched beam specimens. One of the few papers to approach PC from a fracture mechanics perspective rather than simply reporting ultimate strength. Relevant to any application where crack initiation or crack arrest behavior matters.
Ferdous, W., et al. (2020). Optimal design for epoxy polymer concrete based on mechanical properties and durability aspects. Construction and Building Materials, 232, 117229.
A systematic DOE-based optimization of epoxy PC formulation variables against both mechanical performance and durability. One of the most methodologically rigorous experimental papers in the library. The optimization approach is directly replicable for other resin systems.
Haddad, H., & Al Kobaisi, M. (2012). Optimization of the polymer concrete used for manufacturing bases for precision tool machines. Composites Part B, 43(8), 3061–3068.
A rigorous DOE-based optimization of polyester PC for machine base applications across six aggregate types (basalt, spodumene, fly ash, river gravel, sand, chalk), covering flexural strength and coefficient of thermal expansion. Provides one of the most complete flexural/thermal datasets for polyester PC in the library.
Haddad, H., & Sbarski, I. (2017). Optimization of thermal and mechanical properties of unsaturated polyester resin as a binder in polymer concrete for manufacturing precision tool machine bases. Journal of Material Sciences & Engineering, 6(6), Article 395.
Characterizes thermal properties alongside mechanical properties for the neat unsaturated polyester resin used as a PC binder. The thermal characterization data is relevant to understanding thermal expansion mismatch-driven stress at aggregate-resin interfaces.
Orak, S. (2000). Investigation of vibration damping on polymer concrete with polyester resin. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(2), 171–174.
One of the few papers that quantifies vibration damping in polymer concrete, reporting a 4–7× damping advantage over cast iron. A compelling property for machine base and precision equipment applications that is underrepresented in both the literature and industry awareness.
Golestaneh, M., et al. (2010). Evaluation of mechanical strength of epoxy polymer concrete with silica powder filler. World Applied Sciences Journal, 9(2), 216–220.
Investigates the effect of silica powder filler content on compressive and flexural strength of epoxy PC. Establishes an optimum filler loading range and documents diminishing returns with excess filler. Useful as a reference for filler optimization methodology.
Tae, G.H., & Choi, E.S. (2012). Time dependent behavior of polymer concrete using unsaturated polyester resin. InTech Open.
The primary creep reference in the library. Characterizes time-dependent deformation of polyester PC under sustained load — an undercharacterized property for a material commonly used in long-service-life infrastructure. Creep data for other resin systems remains essentially absent from the literature.
Ribeiro, M.C.S., et al. (2003). Thermal expansion of epoxy and polyester polymer mortars — plain mortars and fibre-reinforced mortars. Polymer Testing, 22(8), 849–857.
Characterizes thermal expansion for both epoxy and polyester PC systems with and without fiber reinforcement. One of the few papers directly comparing thermal expansion across resin types under consistent methodology. Relevant to understanding thermal stress development and mold-release forces in precast production.
Abdel-Emam, M., et al. (2018). Dynamic behavior of textile reinforced polymer concrete using split Hopkinson pressure bar. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 49).
Modified split Hopkinson pressure bar dynamic punch-shear testing on textile (glass fabric) reinforced epoxy PC circular plates. Peak force is largely unaffected by fabric layer count, but absorbed energy increases non-monotonically with layer count — 96%, 62%, and 147% for 1, 2, and 3 glass fabric layers respectively. One of the few dynamic-loading datasets in the library.
Arowojolu, O., Ibrahim, A., & Taha, M.M. (2018). Parametric study on the performance of UHPC and nano-modified polymer concrete (NMPC) composite wall panels for protective structures. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 87).
LS-DYNA parametric FEA of hybrid UHPC + nano-modified epoxy PC wall panels under air-burst blast loading. Reports no spalling/collapse across a range of scaled distances and a tensile failure strain (5.0%) more than 200× that of UHPFRC — the clearest blast-resistance data point in the library.
Douba, A., & Reda Taha, M.M. (2018). PC with superior ductility using mixture of pristine and functionalized carbon nanotubes. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 36).
Hybrid pristine + COOH-functionalized MWCNT blends in polysulfide-epoxy PC. The best mix achieves 5.5% strain at failure and a 184% toughness increase over plain PC — the standout ductility-enhancement result in the nanomaterial literature covered here.
Genedy, M., Chennareddy, R., Stenko, M., & Taha, M.M. (2018). Development length of steel reinforcement in polymer concrete for bridge deck closure. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 41).
Pullout bond testing of steel rebar embedded in PMMA-PC for bridge-deck closure pours. Reports development lengths of just 3.6–4.1 bar diameters, versus 12–18d for UHPC and roughly 24d for normal concrete — a striking bond-strength result relevant to any rebar-embedded PC precast joint design.
Göbel, L., Pichler, B., & Osburg, A. (2018). Experimental analysis and micromechanics-based prediction of the elastic and creep properties of polymer-modified concrete at early ages. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 4).
Studies polymer-modified (latex-dispersion) Portland cement concrete, not resin-matrix PC — included as a mechanistic reference for early-age creep/stiffness modeling methodology and multiscale homogenization, not as a direct PC data source.
Sokołowska, J.J. (2018). Long-term investigation on the compressive strength of polymer concrete with fly ash. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 34).
Long-term compressive strength of vinyl ester PC with fluidized and siliceous fly ash microfiller, examining binder/microfiller and powder/microfiller ratio effects on 14-day versus 18-month/7-year strength development.
Taha, M.M. (2018). Nano-modified polymer concrete: a new material for smart and resilient structures. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 6).
COOH-functionalized MWCNT and alumina nanoparticles (ANP) in polysulfide-epoxy PC. 1.0 wt% MWCNT gives +33% flexural strength and +94% fracture toughness (peaking at +128% at 0.5 wt% MWCNT); 2–3 wt% ANP gives +200% failure strain. Pristine MWCNT additionally enables piezoresistive self-sensing — a distinctive capability not seen elsewhere in the library.
Hassani Niaki, M., Fereidoon, A., & Ahangari, M.G. (2018). Experimental study on the mechanical and thermal properties of basalt fiber and nanoclay reinforced polymer concrete. Composite Structures, 191, 231–238.
Basalt fiber gives its best compressive gain at 2 wt% (+10.6%), best split tensile gain at 2.5 wt% (+35.2%), and best impact resistance gain at 3.0 wt% (+315%) in epoxy PC — the optimum loading varies by property. Basalt-fiber PC (2 wt%) retains 100% of its compressive strength at 200°C versus 66% for plain PC. Adding nanoclay on top of basalt fiber gives a further +7%/+27% compressive/flexural gain. One of the strongest basalt-fiber datasets in the library.
Akzharkyn, A., Bekova, Z., Seitkali, A., Abenova, A., & Zhaksybekov, B. (2024). Strengthening polymer concrete by carbon and basalt fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 438, 137197.
Compares carbon (245 GPa) vs. basalt (95 GPa) chopped fiber in a polymeric binder. Basalt fiber at its optimum (1.5 wt%) outperforms carbon fiber at its optimum (1.0 wt%) on every reported metric — +15.4% compressive and +55% elongation before failure versus carbon's +10.1% compressive. Matrix identity (thermoset PC vs. PCC) is not fully confirmed in the source.
Almutairi, A.D., Alateyah, A.I., Saeed, M.K., Dahish, H.A., El-Garaihy, W.H., Alawad, M.O., & BaQais, A. (2025). Comprehensive investigation of the mechanical performance and evaluate the environmental impact of epoxy and polyester polymer concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 22, e04195.
Direct epoxy vs. polyester PC comparison (fly ash + limestone aggregate). Post-cured polyester (104.9 MPa) outperforms room-temperature-cured epoxy (73.9 MPa) by +42% compressive strength; post-curing itself improves polyester's own strength by +24% (84.6→104.9 MPa). Also reports bond-to-OPC strength (substrate failure governs, not the bond line) and NO₂/SO₂ emissions during curing — useful EHS data point absent from most of the literature.
Elalaoui, O. (2023). Effect of short fibers on the mechanical and fracture behavior of epoxy polymer concrete at ambient and elevated temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, 368, 130497.
PP and carbon short fiber (1–2 wt%) in epoxy PC give +24% load-carrying capacity and convert brittle failure to progressive failure — but this fracture-toughening effect vanishes above 250°C as the matrix softens, though PC still outperforms OPC at that temperature. A useful temperature-limit caveat for fiber-toughening claims.
Lokuge, W., & Aravinthan, T. (2013). Effect of fly ash on the behavior of polymer concrete with different types of resin. Materials and Design, 51, 175–181.
A controlled cross-resin study of pozzolanic filler effects on PC mechanical properties, comparing polyester, vinyl ester, and epoxy binders. One of the few papers that directly isolates filler content as a variable across resin types. Documents mechanical benefits of filler addition before diminishing returns set in.
Cakir, F., Yildirim, G., & Gündoğdu, Ö. (2020). Effect of catalysts amount on mechanical properties of polymer concrete. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 11(3).
One of the few papers that treats initiator dosage as an isolated experimental variable. Documents the effect of peroxide initiator content on cure behavior, compressive strength, and open time. The methodology is directly applicable to other resin systems and raises questions about initiator optimization that are largely unaddressed in the literature.
Choi, K.B., Min, S.H., & Yeon, K.S. (2016). Setting shrinkage characteristics of methyl methacrylate-modified vinyl ester polymer concrete. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(5), 586–592.
Documents setting shrinkage of VE PC using dual LVDT measurement from immediately after casting — capturing the critical early shrinkage window that standard demolding-based protocols miss. Key finding: 92.65–98.26% of total shrinkage occurs within the first 6 hours of cure initiation across tested conditions (up to 76.7% within just the first hour in the most extreme case). Essential reading for any shrinkage or dimensional stability study.
Sung, C.Y., & Kim, Y.I. (2012). Void ratio and durability properties of porous polymer concrete using recycled aggregate with binder contents for permeability pavement. Journal of Applied Polymer Science.
Demonstrates polymer concrete formulated at 9–22% void ratio for permeable pavement, achieving compressive strengths above 2,610 psi with high void fraction. Represents a distinct design philosophy from dense PC — intentional porosity rather than optimized packing. The only systematic study of porous PC in the library.
Hong, S. (2017). Influence of curing conditions on the strength properties of polysulfide polymer concrete. Applied Sciences, 7, 833.
Documents how cure temperature and time affect strength development in polysulfide PC. Though polysulfide is a niche system, the methodology — systematic variation of cure conditions against mechanical outcomes — is directly relevant and provides useful comparative context for cure sensitivity studies.
Dębska, B., Almada, B.S., & Brigolini Silva, G. (2024). Impact of different post-curing temperatures on mechanical and physical properties of waste-modified polymer composites. Materials, 17, 5301.
Systematically varies post-cure temperature for epoxy PC and measures the effect on compressive strength, flexural strength, and mass change. Documents significant strength gains from elevated post-cure. The most directly applicable post-cure temperature study in the library, though conducted on epoxy rather than VE systems.
Martínez-Barrera, G., Vigueras-Santiago, E., Hernández-López, S., Brostow, W., & Menchaca-Campos, C. (2013). Polypropylene fibers and gamma irradiation for improvement of mechanical properties of polymer concrete. Polymer Composites, 34(6), 991–999.
PP fiber (0.1–0.3 vol%) in polyester PC. Optimal loading is low — just 0.1 vol% gives the best result, a +24% compressive strength gain (41→51 MPa). Confirms the low-volume-fraction optimum seen elsewhere in PP fiber literature. Mix uses a non-representative 30 wt% resin content and marble aggregate, so absolute values should be treated as directional rather than transferable.
Gorninski, J.P., Dal Molin, D.C., & Kazmierczak, C.S. (2007). Strength degradation of polymer concrete in acidic environments. Cement and Concrete Composites, 29(8), 637–645.
Quantifies flexural strength loss for polyester PC across seven aggressive agents (acetic, citric, formic, lactic, and sulfuric acid, cola soft drink, and distilled water, each at 5% concentration) over five 14-day exposure cycles. Provides the most rigorous acid exposure dataset for polyester PC in the library — a useful comparative baseline when evaluating other resin systems' chemical resistance.
Sakhakarmi, S. (2017). Cost comparison of cement concrete and polymer concrete manholes in sewer systems (Master's Thesis). University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
The primary economic reference for polymer concrete vs. OPC manholes. Documents a system-wide average OPC manhole service life of 23 years and constructs a lifecycle cost comparison. Cite this paper for its empirical service life data — the cost comparison methodology does not include NPV calculations, which limits the precision of direct economic claims.
Fowler, D.W., Meyer, A.H., & Paul, D.R. (1983). MMA polymer concrete for pavement repair (CTR Report 246-3). Center for Transportation Research, UT Austin.
An early field study of methyl methacrylate PC for pavement repair under real traffic loading. Historically important as documentation of MMA PC's practical performance. One of the few sources that treats production procedure as a documented variable — processing detail that is largely absent from academic literature.
Gorninski, J.P., & de Freitas, R. (2018). Analysis of mechanical behavior and durability of coatings for use as flooring in the petroleum industry. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 20).
Epoxy PC mortar coatings across four filler/aggregate combinations. Reports water absorption as low as 0.07% and abrasive wear 1.40–2.99 mm, meeting NBR 14050 Type 1 flooring compliance. A useful data point for PC as a thin protective coating system, distinct from structural PC applications.
Sokołowska, J.J., & Woyciechowski, P.P. (2018). Chemical resistance of vinyl-ester concrete with waste mineral dust remaining after preparation of aggregate for asphalt mixture. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 63).
A 10-composition statistical design (response surface) testing 31-day immersion in 1M sulfuric acid and 4% NaOH for VE PC with waste limestone dust substituting quartz powder as microfiller. Reports mass loss and compressive strength change as functions of binder/microfiller and powder/microfiller ratios — a rare formal DOE approach to PC chemical resistance.
Shen, D., Liu, X., Lv, J., & Shen, M. (2019). Experimental study on the mechanical properties and acid resistance of vinyl ester resin polymer concrete with glass fiber. Construction and Building Materials, 213, 271–282.
VE PC with 0.3 vol% E-glass fiber immersed in H₂SO₄ (pH 0.5–2.0) at 60°C for 50 days. Key finding: acid attack is surface-limited and does not penetrate the interior even at the most aggressive condition tested (pH 0.5, 50 days), with ~85–95% compressive strength retention. Primary experimental validation for the surface-limited VE PC acid resistance mechanism cited elsewhere in this library.
van Zyl, F.W., & Kruger, D. (2025). The use of polymer concrete as a cost-effective and durable alternative for rapid pothole repair in asphalt surfaces. ICPIC 2023 Proceedings.
Laboratory evaluation of polymer concrete mixes for rapid pothole repair — compressive strength, flexural strength, and abrasion resistance testing, benchmarked against the properties typically required for road surfaces. The fast-cure, bond-to-substrate, and ambient-cure requirements distinguish this application from precast manufacturing contexts and introduce a distinct set of design constraints; no in-service field trial is reported.
Stenko, M.S. (2018). Precast polymer concrete panels for use on bridges and tunnels. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 44).
Documents precast polymer concrete panel systems for bridges and tunnels — facing/protective elements rather than load-bearing structures, typically installed with lower-cost concrete backfill (new construction) or flowable grout (retrofit) providing the structural support. Covers anchorage and bolt-blockout installation details and custom panel lengths matched to expansion joints.
Fowler, D.W., & Whitney, D.P. (2018). Overlays: a great use for polymer concrete. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 35).
Documents over 40 years of PC overlay experience on bridge decks, including 2,400+ documented installations across North American transportation agencies. The failure mode documentation, service life data, and installation practice evolution make this one of the most data-rich application references in the library.
Yeon, K.S., Kim, K.K., & Yeon, J. (2018). Feasibility study of the use of polymer-modified cement composites as 3D concrete printing material. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 3).
A preliminary feasibility study — not a resin-matrix polymer concrete, but a Portland cement/fly ash/slag composite modified with a water-soluble polymer, extruded through a 3D printer nozzle. Adding the polymer decreased extrusion velocity (higher viscosity) and increased setting time, but improved buildability — 13–15 layers to 16–20 cm height before collapse, versus fewer for the unmodified mix. Useful mainly as a fresh-property framework (flowability, extrudability, open time, buildability) for anyone evaluating polymer-modified systems for additive manufacturing.
Hong, S., Lee, J., Kim, D., Kim, J., & Jeong, Y. (2018). Development of ultrarapid-hardening epoxy mortar for railway sleepers. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 42).
A 12-mix binder screening study optimizing bisphenol-A epoxy mortar for emergency railway sleeper repair. The optimum mix reaches 52.6 MPa compressive strength in just 3 hours and 68.6 MPa at 7 days, meeting Korean standard KS F 4043. A strong reference for any rapid-return-to-service PC repair application.
Sprinkel, M.M. (2018). Bridge preservation: overlays and closures using polymer concrete. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 2).
A 50+ year practice review of Virginia DOT's PC/PMC bridge preservation program, covering latex-modified-concrete/VE overlays, epoxy/polyester/methacrylate multiple-layer overlays, high-friction surface treatments, and PC closure pours for precast deck replacement. Reports specific binder properties, aggregate gradations, and surface-prep criteria alongside real service-life and cost figures (e.g., 30–40 yr overlay life at $150/yd²).
Vogt, F., Gypser, A., Kleiner, F., & Osburg, A. (2018). Polymer concrete for a modular construction system: investigation of mechanical properties and bond behaviour by means of X-ray CT. ICPIC 2018 Proceedings (Ch. 31).
Orthophthalic polyester PC (108 MPa compressive strength) reinforced with bamboo and Tonkin cane for a modular housing system. Short-term creep testing shows the PC withstands 50% of its breaking load for about an hour at 80°C before failure — a thermal-service caveat relevant to any outdoor structural PC application. X-ray CT imaging of the reinforced samples further reveals debonding between the PC matrix and reinforcement near the bearings, indicating anchoring details need improvement.
A note on coverage gaps. The polymer concrete literature is thinner than the volume of published papers suggests. Production and processing science — what actually happens during mixing, compaction, and demolding — is almost entirely absent as a controlled study. Long-term field durability data beyond manufacturer-reported service life estimates is scarce. We note these gaps because they are as useful to practitioners as what the literature does establish.